Why Guidebooks? aka

The Value of Climbing Guides

NOTE: Guidebook implies a certain standard. Printing a list of climbs is not a guidebook. Beyond that, what you make of it is yours to decide. This article focuses on the concrete aspects of curation that anyone can apply to benefit their community.

Better Quality

Someone who's ready to build a guidebook knows an area well and has information worth conveying. A guidebook is the closest the author will come to sharing their experince at an area with new climbers, If you love an area, you're the perfect person to share it.

Tools to match the Purpose

There's a Data, Information, Knowledge, Wisdom hierarchy (Ackoff, 1989) that explains what we can know about a topic. Observations recorded become data, data organized becomed information, information applied becomes knowledge. The job of creating a guide is to convey that knowledge. After that, it's up to the climber to get out and build the wisdom of the area on their own

A climbing guide is easy to undervalue. It sits on a shelf, gets tossed in a pack, accumulates chalk dust. But a good guide is one of the clearest signs that a climbing community is healthy – and one of the most reliable ways to keep it that way.


What a Guide Produces

Economic Reinvestment

A guidebook author is typically someone with a direct stake in the place they’re writing about. When climbers buy a local guide, money stays in the community – at the gear shop that stocks it, with the author who wrote it, and often with the local climbing organization that benefits from the author’s involvement. Mike Williams directs a dollar from every copy of his New River Rock guides to the New River Alliance of Climbers.

Traffic Distribution

A guide that covers an area thoroughly – not just the classics, but the lesser-known walls, the moderate routes, the quieter sectors – spreads climbers across the landscape. That distribution matters for access.

Roadside Crag at the Red River Gorge is a useful case. Home to a high concentration of accessible sport routes, it became a victim of its own visibility. Closed in 2011 after repeated access violations, reopened under permit in 2015, closed again in 2019, reopened again in 2021 – a cycle driven in part by traffic that arrived without context, without investment in the place, and without any particular reason to behave differently next time.

A guide doesn’t solve that problem entirely. But it gives climbers context before they arrive – who owns the land, what the expectations are, what else is worth climbing nearby.

Cultural Transmission

An area has ethics, history, and local customs that don’t fit a database field. Who put up the first routes, what the community expects of visitors, which approaches to avoid during nesting season, what the local grades feel like compared to the national consensus – this is knowledge that lives in guides, in conversations, and in the people who’ve been climbing somewhere for decades. A guide is the opportunity to pass this along

The Ten Sleep guides are a clear example of what happens when this is done well. Aaron Huey’s guide, Lies and Propaganda from Ten Sleep Canyon, is a cultural artifact as a reference. The design, tone, and content all make an argument about what Ten Sleep is and what it means to climb there. Ten Sleep is in the middle of Wyoming, hours from anywhere. It draws the climbing world anyway, and the guides are part of why.

Other excellent areas in the region (e.g. Vedauwoo, the Fins, Devils Tower, Wild Iris) don't get as much attention. Recognition varies, and a guide with aesthetic ambition and well-mixed knowledge and can close that gap. It can convey an area’s character to someone who hasn't yet arrived.

The Area as a Whole

A guide presents an area as something to be understood, not just accessed. A reader who works through a good introduction – the geology, the history, the access situation, the local culture – arrives oriented. They know what they’re walking into. That orientation makes them a better visitor, a more considerate climber, and a more likely return customer for the community that depends on climbing traffic.

Help Users Discover

A database tells you what exists. A good guide gives you reason and confidence to explore.

The climber who arrives at an unfamiliar area with a well-written guide and spends a day working through it – finding the moderate route that nobody talks about, taking the approach variation that avoids the crowds, ending up somewhere they didn’t plan to be – is having an experience closer to discovery than the one who went straight to the classic because it had the most stars. Discovery is what makes climbers prolific, not the other way around. The enthusiasm that builds areas, sustains communities, and sends people back weekend after weekend comes from feeling like the rock is still offering something new. A guide should that preserves that feeling of exploration, it should that orients th reader without managing them


The Author Is the Guide

Everything above happens because of the author has a special relationship to a place. This isn't something that a platform, committee, or algorithm can reproduce.

The author knows which climb is sandbagged and why. They know which landowner needs to see climbers behaving well at the trailhead. They know that the 5.10 in the back of the canyon is worth the walk and that the three-star classic near the road is overcrowded and starting to show it. This can't be crowdsourced into existence.

A guide author is a keystone member of their climbing community. Remove them – or never have them in the first place – and the knowledge doesn’t get written down, the area doesn’t get contextualized, and the community doesn't have something that could have oriented another generation.


Guides are valuable because they're so scarce. They're scarce because they're hard to produce. Good guides are hard to produce because clerical work is foundational but takes up _so_ much time. Once the clerical work is done, it's tempting to rush to an exit instead of dwell on dual most important part. stele1 is designed to get you past the clerical work and onto the creative work that will make a difference to the community
i have faith that many people would write good guides, but don't because they burn out. I know for certain that some do because I've been that person: I've both rushed guides to a sub-par publishable product and have sat on 90% finished guides that i exhausted myself organizing.

For more on what happens when databases substitute for guides at scale, see [SSORD]. For more on what a healthy climbing ecosystem looks like when guides are part of it, see The Cycle.